Listening to Celia on the 4th of July

Happy Day after the 4th of July. The USA spins onward as an idea but its system jumps the groove and skips, scratching painfully across freedom and hope. This music lover returned to Celia to hear her lyrics and sweet music again. 

I heard Celia’s first album many years ago and admired mid-flight the skater of flirting and the song about not wondering how best to explain. Her lyrics blew me away. Her next albums were even better than the first. ‘You Just Gave Your Love Away’ seemed like a study in beautiful exasperation—sweet sadness and affection rolled in tough love. And ‘Big Brother’ in his exceptionalism is appealed to with gentle irony. The fool must try harder. ‘My Project for the New American Century’ is a truth held up as a worn stone. A truth troubled about, and worried over time through the fingers…and the self. I celebrate myself and sing myself, as Whitman said. It’s good to keep singing. It’s brave, and the only available attitude. I sing myself—not as a shining city on a hill—but as wisdom in the wilderness Celia learned a way around and through.

‘Unrequited’ is a gorgeous wreck. It becomes the center of attention under a street lamp of capital-S self. The nonsense and embarrassment give it an eternal quality. It’s an infinite loop of rejection. The feeling lives up to expectation every time, unbearably funny.

Transformateurs is made up of fine points which reflect a generosity that makes me play it again, Sam. I love gentle jazz. Can’t you see, baby, it’s all free baby? Innocence gained better than ever before. Freedom. Heroics arranged happily. The songs are odd and beautiful, fleet of foot like a deer aware of its grace. A universal whirled and spun into something crystalline. To listen is to lose chains. ‘Things You’ll Miss’ carries a weight of hurt in an arrangement that reveals depth of still water. ‘Time Traveler’ is isolation in a frightening chamber. One tries to avoid getting caught up in the spinning whirly-gadgets one uses to not know the state of things. One tries harder to wage more awareness, less avoidance.

And Vic of Araby! Nobody sees this listener with a better clarity. You are the only one. The goddess gaze penetrates as I stand in the unbearable exposure by a western sun. That’s the artist’s light, too. A sunbeam with no delay or break in its shining. A light more swift and intimate than this Universe knew before I listened to Celia. Such is the goodness of the self she sings.



Like Sands Through the Hourglass

What is essential is not to be kind, but the desire to win over self. The desire to be kind? I always wanted an identical twin. A constant companion. A better half?

Maybe I have an identical twin. Virtue on one shoulder and Vice on the other. I’m stuck in the middle. An embryo split by the corpus callosum in my head.

It’s not easy being evil, nor simple to be good. Self-love is the twin in the looking glass, the reflection showing a distorted image of who I might be. Who I may be. whoImaybe.

I know many twins, some identical. I knew the first pair in first grade. Joseph and Matthew. I don’t remember if they were identical because I only played with Joseph at recess. Or maybe it was Matthew. One wore blue, the other red. I remember Joseph wore red. Joseph was in my own classroom, separated to foster independence. 

The second twins I knew were Hester and Hannah. I warned them I could easily tell them apart and challenged them to leave the room and come back. I won. Then they moved to my school and began to go by their middle names. I didn’t know who was who anymore. Which was which. They became rotating lights. 

One set came from books. Sweet Valley Twins. They were blond and Californian. Elizabeth was sensible and bookish, Jessica haughty and fun. Simple opposites, like Sharon and Susan in The Parent Trap who were Boston or California in one Hayley Mills. Geography twins. East and West. Sharon the perfectionist. Susan the carefree.

One summer I went to camp and told kids I had known for years my name was ‘Hope’. Holly had stayed home due to a health condition. I don’t remember why she had to stay home. That was the problem with her scheme. She needed a convincing absence for my other half. The flu in summer? Or she had an obligation. She was visiting a relative? Holly’s excuse for her absence wound up being vague because Hope was a liar. The friends believed us for a few days while suspecting the switch. Kindness. Holly named her Hope for obvious reasons, and got the name from Days of Our Lives. Holly was making light of her reality. Making light of hope. 

These…are the days of our lives….

As for devils and soaps, a certain set of daytime twins were a polarity like Elizabeth and Jessica were. One was naïve and the other one a schemer. She was blond too!

Kindness can be cruel, humility false. So…are the masks we wear. Liars lie, schemers scheme, kindness is wanting. Time passes, and I go on. 

I wish I knew better how to live without envy or worry. I wrote a poem last week but it felt simple. No chicanery and no enchantment. It made a claim about plants and constancy. 

It is certainly true of succulents who are so full of themselves. If I were a plant I would be a jade. The woody stem, the buttery leaves. When healthy they resemble stones. Glossy, worn by a river. Happy. 

Inside a jade leaf is only water. Glossy exterior, empty interior. Juiced insides. Pulp fiction. Garden variety Sweet Valley self.

Janus is the god of gates and new beginnings. Janus has two faces, one looking forward and one back. Twins can be the same when they share you. Splitting can seem shady and spinny. Jessica missing the party and Elizabeth performing poorly on a test. Unmanageable. Damaging. Wrong.

Twinning is an ordeal I can handle. These days of my lives have been spinning and bleak. Splitting and hot. Spring is behind us. I sat down to write. Or somebody did….

In the interest of integrity and holistic splitting, here is the poem.

How many times do I need to understand this?
How much destruction weighs a ton?
I love the phrase Pride goes before a fall,
A fall I can’t handle,
A truth I can’t dispel or swallow.
Everything seems so bright, and so good.
Everything seems worthwhile.
Plants grow, faithfully.
Faith is their nature.
Abundance and fruit break their seed every year,
A painful growth.
Craft is a word for making and a word for tricking.
The sun is sweet and shows its strength.
I don’t feel human, or good.


Playing Hide and Seek: A Meditation on Words

I have been wandering of late. I’m wandering through my own heart and mind, juxtaposing my actions and words with my thoughts and experiences. I have been wondering of late. I’m wondering what is right, and I’m trying to teach myself what action to take in the very moment it is necessary to act. I’m trying to learn and trying to do at the same time, to hop on one foot while carving a circle in the air with my left pinky, or some such impossible feat.

It sounds like a lot. It seems like I have my heart and hands full. But I don’t know whether they really are that full.

There’s a lot of pain in this life, and mine is much less than a billionth of what’s out there. Almost all the world’s turmoil has nothing to do with my petty personal complaints. But I think a lot of it comes from personal complaint, singular. It is ego, and ego is no small ingredient in the cruelty we see so much of, from police brutality to military invasion.

Mayhaps I should clarify what I mean by ego. The word has positive and negative associations, and it serves as a beast of burden for many an academic paper.

It seems so hard to understand right now what is moral in this Universe. Are we to view ourselves as individuals, which seems to drop us in the realm of lonely particulars (or roaming particles), who operate best when acting in their own self-interest? Or should we instead dissolve that particularity in our individual minds, in order to sign up for a notion of diffuse humanity and nebulous sameness?

I’ve been feeling intensely my own petty pains lately, both physical and emotional. My jaw aches, and the oral splint I’m wearing has become flat from grinding. I’m angry a lot, or I feel hurt emotionally. I have been wanting to avenge wounds, and not just the ones inflicted on me.

I think it was Jung or maybe it was Freud or Horney or Maslow or somebody else who claimed ego is a positive development in persons, a necessary and healthy structure, the result of met needs and normal growth. When we use the word in conversation we generally throw it in the trash bin on moral grounds, damning it distastefully with a scrap of chalk we picked up off the ground beside the foot of the neighbor we were grousing to.

Yesterday I read a short excerpt from David Whyte’s book, Consolations: The Solace, Nourishment and Underlying Meaning of Everyday Words. I love the idea of his book. I love his attempt to unearth unconscious meanings through ordinary language. This essay was on “hiding”. (By the way, he doesn’t have an entry in his book for ego. I guess that word has too big a head for his compendium, especially when it’s so-to-speak, hiding its inferiority complex in the italic formatting I applied to it here…so unlike humble “hiding” who questions its meaning inside a pair of apostrophes…appearing to our eyes, apocryphal [of doubtful authenticity], a word which itself finds its source in the Greek apokryphos [hidden; obscure, hard to understand]. And there’s that word hidden, hiding in plain sight in the meaning of apocryphal.)

Whyte says,

Hiding is a bid for independence, from others, from mistaken ideas we have about our selves, from an oppressive and mistaken wish to keep us completely safe, completely ministered to, and therefore completely managed.

I was here struck here by the contraindications.

(And just as I note here my use of the medical word contraindication to examine Whyte’s statement, I also know it’s because I’m seeing him as a doctor from whom I can get help for a spiritual ailment.)

At first, I found this part confused. Isn’t hiding a solitary act? We choose a place for complete safety which can’t be found. In order to be safe. How is it a bid for independence from a wish to keep us safe? We seek hiding for safety. In independence we are choosing solitude. In solitude, safety. You see, hiding is, for me, essentially a place of cover. Maybe even a place of fear.

Whyte goes on, seeming from my perspective to grab the axis of his idea and twirl it the other way.

Hiding is creative, necessary and beautifully subversive of outside interference and control. Hiding leaves life to itself, to become more of itself. Hiding is the radical independence necessary for our emergence into the light of a proper human future.

He talks about the “dissected soul” in a world awash with “too easily articulated ideas that oppress our sense of self and our sense of others”.

He also says this, which I loved:

What is real is almost always to begin with, hidden, and does not want to be understood by the part of our mind that mistakenly thinks it knows what is happening. What is precious inside us does not care to be known by the mind in ways that diminish its presence.

His meditation opens with “Hiding is a way of staying alive.” We are hiding from ourselves and from others. We are hiding from control while flying through a void at a pace that is itself out of control.

Well, back to my grasp of ‘ego’. I’m tempted to wax deep, and talk about the seat of the soul. Instead I’ll think about the hidden nature of ego, or the purpose of it, or how pride can be a good thing. I sometimes view ego and pride not exactly as one and the same, but as swirling planets coexistent in an ambiguous cosmos where self-interest makes up the aether. I know ego can be a good thing. I knew there exists a form of pride that is, for lack of a better term, good. What I did not know, is exactly how fine the line is between the self-interest and other-interest. The malignancy of hate and malice is borne by those harboring those feelings or attitudes. I must accept myself as both discrete and as a part of a whole. Particle and wave. Others are watching. I am watching. Life is watching.

What I now see is that the hidden precious thing is pain. Seeds and embryos are pain, breaking their own casing to carve out a space, to assert their growth deeper into the world, to come into the light. To become exposed while keeping their endosperm protected, and their potential under wraps. The hidden thing–the thing which we become–may only process and proceed when we give our hidden, inmost self its due respect. Protection of self. Protection, too, of the hidden in others. Precious suggests a requirement of honor.

The following is the full meditation on ‘Hiding’, from Whyte’s book:

Hiding is a way of staying alive. Hiding is a way of holding ourselves until we are ready to come into the light. Even hiding the truth from ourselves can be a way to come to what we need in our necessary time.

Hiding is one of the brilliant and virtuoso practices of almost every part of the natural world: the protective quiet of an icy northern landscape, the held bud of a future summer rose, the snow bound internal pulse of the hibernating bear.

Hiding is underestimated. We are hidden by life in our mother’s womb until we grow and ready ourselves for our first appearance in the lighted world; to appear too early in that world is to find ourselves with the immediate necessity for outside intensive care.

Hiding done properly is the internal faithful promise for a proper future emergence, as embryos, as children or even as emerging adults in retreat from the names that have caught us and imprisoned us, often in ways where we have been too easily seen and too easily named.

We live in a time of the dissected soul, the immediate disclosure; our thoughts, imaginings and longings exposed to the light too much, too early and too often, our best qualities squeezed too soon into a world already awash with too easily articulated ideas that oppress our sense of self and our sense of others.

What is real is almost always to begin with, hidden, and does not want to be understood by the part of our mind that mistakenly thinks it knows what is happening. What is precious inside us does not care to be known by the mind in ways that diminish its presence.

Hiding is an act of freedom from the misunderstanding of others, especially in the enclosing world of oppressive secret government and private entities, attempting to name us, to anticipate us, to leave us with no place to hide and grow in ways unmanaged by a creeping necessity for absolute naming, absolute tracking and absolute control.

Hiding is a bid for independence, from others, from mistaken ideas we have about our selves, from an oppressive and mistaken wish to keep us completely safe, completely ministered to, and therefore completely managed.

Hiding is creative, necessary and beautifully subversive of outside interference and control. Hiding leaves life to itself, to become more of itself. Hiding is the radical independence necessary for our emergence into the light of a proper human future.

Hell is a Teenage Girl (A Comical, Belated #MeToo Tale of the Most Haunted Kind)

Thirty years ago I walked off the plank into high school where blue skies promised Homecoming and fall colors and new beginnings. I was fresh off the boat from junior high, where I had weathered storms. Volleyball was underway. Cheerleading. I think life had seemed to be going pretty well for the first time in a while.

I had a learner’s driving permit and I drove myself to school in a hand-me-down Mercury. I was getting better at operating the clutch, but I continued to arrive to the parking lot in sputtering fits and starts where people saw or heard me coming. I was notorious!

I was surprised when an older boy took an interest in me. He was a Junior. We began passing long notes back and forth several times per week. I felt blessed to suddenly have a friend. However, the grapevine operates quickly in a small school. During this period of passing notes, a joke he made in my absence made its way to my ears. When a boy asks other people to tell a girl that it doesn’t hurt to lose your virginity, is he being funny? I wasn’t thinking about sex. I didn’t want to be touched anywhere. Junior High had been extremely painful. I had not qualified in a cheerleading tryout in eighth grade. I had flirted with anorexia. Worse, I had developed during those two years a terrible firestorm of hormonal acne on my chin which had left me scarred physically and emotionally. I had been groped, mocked, and asked deeply personal questions about my body.

Now I suddenly had a pen pal who compared me to Nicole Kidman and talked of his love of strawberry blond hair. Beside his love of red hair flew red flags, even in his friendly letters to me, all written in purple ink with a flourishing cursive pen stroke. In one of his notes he relayed a story about a friend in my own class who had been trying on clothes. He said she shouldn’t go shopping because it made her feel “depressed”. What was going on? Hell is a teenage girl.

I was passive, and I continued to believe he was my friend. He was polite one evening when we were driving around my small town. It was my first time alone with him. I have no memory of the conversation between us. When I dropped him off he leaned in to kiss me. I instinctively pulled away. I did not want a kiss–maybe because I felt shame over my skin problems, or possibly it was the joke about virginity or because he seemed to be shaming other girls, or because he seemed gay. I just didn’t know him well enough. Hell is a teenage girl.

I sent him a brief note the next morning explaining that we were friends. I just didn’t know him. Hell is a teenage girl. I was worried about how he would feel, yet confident he would understand that I just didn’t yet know him well enough. I tried to be gentle, and I didn't think of it as rejection. I believed that if I were to be given more time to better understand him, I might want to kiss him, or date him. I didn’t want to reject him for the wrong reason. I didn’t want to reject him. Hell is a teenage girl.

Later that day, another Junior called me a bitch in the hallway near the band room. This person had always been friendly and kind to me. I began to doubt my communication. If this guy who had always been so nice believed I was a bitch, then certainly my words and actions had been out of line. I had been cruel, not kind. Hell is a teenage girl.

The following weekend I arrived from a tournament late at night to pick up the Mercury from the school. I jumped off the bus to find every inch of its surface smeared with layers of Crisco. I learned later it took three cans to do the job. It was stuffed under the door handles, and it covered the side mirrors. Because it was almost Halloween and I didn’t believe I had rejected anybody, I did not suspect him.

Hell is a teenage girl.

On the Passing of Michael K. Williams

If you’ve never watched The Wire by HBO, do it. Turn on your TV now. It’s Dickens for contemporary politics. It’s a kind of wasteland of joy. It’s beauty all wrapped up in cocaine and heroin. It’s the best TV show I’ve ever seen. 

Michael K. Williams died this week. He played Omar Little, the vigilante of the show. Selling drugs and evading the cops and his many enemies in the drug world, he was a tough gunslinger and an anarchist wrapped up in an enigma. 

It’s the story of Baltimore. It’s the story of life on the streets, and the children who are gunned down or sold into slavery of a kind, peddling a product that soothes and kills.

Watch all seasons! Believe me, it’s worth it.

tempImagevNE0Up.png

In a Fetal Heartbeat

The abortion issue is a hot question in my Facebook feed these days. As the election approaches, I would like to share a little about my views and feelings on the topic. 

Many folks are deeply troubled by abortion, and so am I. So much so that I can barely stomach statistics about it, and I avoid the topic all together on most days. I have a difficult time even researching legislation addressing doctor-patient concerns and the unborn. 

I have had a number of dialogues about it with close associates and friends, and I have defended my participation in the Women’s March in spite of the fact that people seem to view my participation there as some form of holocaust advocacy. 

It’s with a lot of trepidation that I even broach the subject here, so much that my fingers tremble as I write about it. 

Trump’s official position on abortion is “Pro-Life”, yet everybody seems to be aware he is hypocritical on the issue, having funded abortions for former lovers, and being of low moral character and without a depth of understanding on the topic. When he was interviewed prior to his election victory, he intimated that women who have abortions should be charged with homicide, or at least go to prison. Even many Pro-Life advocates disagreed with that particular statement and responded with outrage and, I presume viewed the act of “killing” during an abortion as being the act and responsibility of the doctor alone. 

Before I go any further, I would like to say that I am an attorney who studied Bioethics in Law School, and I struggled intensely over Roe v. Wade during my Constitutional Law class, and I agree with the conclusion drawn by the justices who ruled according to their competing opinions and arguments, and set a solid precedent for the country. The ruling judgment by the justices in that decision was harrowing, deeply thought out, and treasured the life of the unborn fetus or child in the womb. 

I challenge anybody to read the decision on their own and find a better solution than Roe v. Wade.

One of the most troubling aspects of the debate is the involvement of men who are ardent Pro-Lifers, who could never and probably would never give birth even had they an opportunity to do so. I have empathy for the point of view that the “life” also belongs to the man, so I rarely argue with them. When I do discuss the topic, I do it with an open ear and heart. I am aware that it makes their hearts ache also, and I don’t object to their opinion in itself. However, I am disheartened when they take a side in the debate at the political level. 

I am a woman. I read Roe seventeen years ago in Law School. And I have never had the debate that needs to be held with men who take a Pro-Life stance, especially politicians in my deeply Republican state–politicians who are both Pro-Life and Pro-2nd amendment, and get elected in a….heartbeat. 

I don’t know why I am finally addressing the issue with all these folks who never read the decision reached by Roe v. Wade. I have to keep reminding myself I am a lawyer, that other folks have not read it–and yet they take a position. 

That is a deeply ignorant act, people. 

I have been shamed for participating in a protest against a deeply divisive political leader, yet I have never had an abortion. What does that tell you about our Society? About the level of respect for women, about the Patriarchal extremists that rule Middle America, and about gender, life and birth? 

So now I’m flipping the light on. And I am flipping the argument back on them. I want to ask all the Pro-Life men in my Facebook Feed, and in my life, and in my world: 

If you could have a baby, would you hold it?

"My Dear, I Don't Give a Damn"

Have you read Gone with the Wind

I came to know the story as a young girl, by watching the movie starring Vivien Leigh as the haughty, superficial Scarlett

But I'm really here to talk about the book itself. The story that it tells about America, women, the South, the War, and slavery. 

The book revolves around the strong willed and selfish Scarlett. She is the daughter of a wealthy plantation owner who immigrated from Ireland. Her mother, a resigned woman of noble French origin, dies of typhoid after caring for the sick child of a poor sharecropper who Scarlett and her sisters call 'white trash'. 

After Sherman’s march across Georgia, Scarlett does everything in her power to keep Tara (her family plantation) from being sold by carpetbaggers. She works with her hands to rake in a meager food source after all the slaves have left. She steals the fiancé betrothed to her younger sister. She comes up with a way to pay the taxes on Tara when the carpetbaggers swoop in to avenge their own wounds. And she continually manipulates and claws her way into respectable society, using marriage and men to find her way back to a state of ease and the lost idyll of antebellum Georgia. She does all this while everyone around her is falling apart and mourning a lost way of life.

Scarlett feeds her own family during and after the war. Following her mother's death, her father has become a mumbling, walking whiskey bottle of stereotyped Irish insanity. And her sisters do not have the strength of mind to help, or to establish a sense of stability.

Some characters who know her from the beginning (namely, Rhett Butler and India Wilkes), are aware of her obsession with the genteel husband of the respectable, good-hearted Melanie–a man who rejects her in the book's early scenes. Through the odd circumstances of the Civil War battles, and family connections, Melanie winds up being oddly devoted to Scarlett. She dotes on her in spite of the swirling rumors. She chooses to see the best in her, even though Scarlett's returned scorn is barely concealed, and in spite of Scarlett’s sense of entitlement to Ashley, who remains devoted to Melanie. Where Scarlett is wicked, Melanie can only see strength. Where Melanie is honest, Scarlett can only see weakness. It's a fascinating juxtaposition. However, Melanie is one of those whom Scarlett feeds after Tara has gone to seed. She has become family, and in her physical weakness, she is dependent upon the breadwinning Scarlett.

And then there's Rhett Butler. He's a dashing, reckless profiteer, who falls in love with Scarlett after witnessing her private tantrum over Melanie’s and Ashley’s engagement in the book's early stages. Rhett has questionable ties to blockading, but he nevertheless sees Scarlett more clearly than anyone else. Even more, he loves her for who she is. After he and Scarlett finally marry, he dotes on their young daughter (“Bonnie Blue”), until she dies in a tragic accident. Throughout the tale, he is an evolving question mark until his final words to Scarlett, who thanks to Melanie's dying words of persuasion, has finally seen the light: 

"My Dear, I don't give a damn."

There's so much to talk about in Gone With the Wind. Margaret Mitchell was an invalid when she wrote it, and I have always questioned why her only book seems has always seemed to me to be such an urgent novel. It seems as if she was desperately trying to to tell us a story that included slavery and the war, but also wanted to tell us about how the lives affected by the War itself transcended the politics of the time. Many people now condemn the book for its depiction of black slaves. Scarlett spews racist epithets for the young Prissy, who proves useless when it comes time to deliver Melanie's baby during Sherman's March on Atlanta. 

To be sure, the book is not sympathetic to black people. But that's not the story it's telling. Margaret Mitchell seems to be telling a story about women in particular, from her own perspective. And the story is organized around womanhood, strength, power, beauty, loss and goodness.

Oh, the wiles and power of a debutante's heart. 

In the latter half of the book, Scarlett is attacked in the dark while driving her buggy past a shantytown. Her weak minded second husband rounds up a group of men to avenge the attack, and we see the beginning of the Ku Klux Klan. It's a dark moment. And we're reminded of Scarlett and her frequently selfish motives. 

What do I really want to say about Scarlett? About Melanie? The book is really about these two. Two southern belles who had everything going their way before the war. In the opening scene Mammy, a black house slave, urges Scarlett to eat pancakes while cinching up her corset. Then we meet Melanie at the Twelve Oaks picnic who, according to Scarlett, is a homely woman with the lashless eyes of all the Wilkes girls. 

Conversely, Melanie is both gentle and genteel. She is privileged, but her power resides in a grace and a self-possession Scarlett could never attain or understand. As southern women, they're two sides of the same coin. Flirtation as power. Grace as attractive force. It is the homely Melanie who wins Ashley Wilkes's heart, the man who Scarlett mistakenly adores from day one. 

Even later in the book, when Scarlett pieces together a dress from the velvety green drapes of Tara to hide her new working class status, she is the picture of haughtinesspower and privilege. Even when Melanie, stumbling after a difficult pregnancy down the stairs of Tara in a pale nightgown, wielding a heavy sword to confront a Yankee intruder, is all heart

Each time I've read Gone With the Wind, it was Melanie's death that affected me most, and I think that’s probably the case with most readers. Her body broken after another difficult pregnancy, she faces death with a grim honor. And it is only then that Scarlett realizes the shallowness and stupidity of her prior apathy towards Rhett, by then her husband of many years. So Melanie's heart seems to win out over Scarlett's heartless-ness. She becomes a Christ figure in death, and is resurrected in Scarlett's oh-so-human resolve to change. Rhett's final piece of dialogue reminds us of the despair and futility of overcoming the demons within (both his own and Scarlett's). He is both broken by Melanie's and Bonnie's deaths, and his heart is hardened against Scarlett in a way that can only be described as totally and completely final

What does the book have to teach us? Scarlett ends the book with her typical, tough optimism: "Tomorrow is Another Day". But Bonnie, Melanie, and now Rhett have departed, whether for the afterlife or another part of the South. Scarlett stands alone, almost like a triumphant devil, and we're all still reeling from Melanie's death when Rhett finally walks out the door for good. 

To me, Melanie stands in for the Beatitudes from the Gospel of Matthew. She is blessed, because she is meek. She inherits the Earth, even though she dies. The meaning is the mystery, which is the two sides of the coin the southern belles represent. What does it mean to be a woman is another question introduced by the story, but even more, is the question of what does it mean to be real, humble and truthful? How are we to face the world? What after all, is true strength?

fa333bf6c3c2a2bfed45ff86fb51b632.jpg

Straight Ticket

Have you noticed how people with political opinions talk about both parties like they're crazy? Have you observed the belligerence that accompanies the political process, and the demonization and rush-to-judgment attacks on statements made and reported on by the Press?

Of course you have. We all suffer from a temptation to demonize. 

Yes, I voted for Sweet Killary, who went to Yale with high hopes. And Barry the Bummer who thwarted her goals. And I voted for Kerry who wore his Purple Heart with pride (but not on his sleeve), even though he married a ketchup tycoon. And I voted for Slick the sax player, before a dress made Killary blue. I voted for Willie even though he might have inhaled. But then later on, I inhaled.  

It all goes back to Dukakis. Was there a name for him? I'll make one up. How about Dukakis the Decent, who lost to Bush in my 5th grade mock election, by a margin of 17 to 1.

I didn't really even know anything about Dukakis the Decent, except that I, along with the other 17 classmates who voted against him, laughed and laughed when his only young supporter firmly announced his blue vote in a sea of red 11 year-olds. After each of us had visited the little navy booth in the corner of the classroom, and slyly marked our ballots, a lone Dukakis the Decent advocate took a lonely stand. 

He was an island. 

Dukakis? I don't know whether or not we were judging this class rebel, but his open statement gave us quite a shock. Clearly Democrats were aliens. Everyone thought so. Our reaction can be compared to the Dowager Countess who said, "Excuse me, everyone. But what is a week-end?"

"He's going to lose," we said, and lose he did. Politics was a sport and we were confused. I felt sorry for him. I might even have felt sorry for Dukakis the Decent

Fast forward a few years. Around the time puberty reared its head, I started reading Newsweek magazine. Rebellion during my teen years was right there for the taking, sitting squarely on the coffee table, a fresh, glossy weekly arrival to our farm mailbox. I took to heart much of what it had to teach me. The political cartoons were so funny and well drawn. Sometimes I found the stories dull, but muddling through a long article took my mind off my personal woes. I frequently chose the path of most resistance. And I learned. 

So that's how I became a Democrat. There are a few votes I look back on with wonder. Why did I think Ketchup Kerry was a good choice, even though he was wealthy? Why did Lockbox Al turn me off, even though I voted for him anyway? And now that people are putting up photos of Michelle embracing George the Painter, should I reevaluate my votes from the past? 

We can never really know where the country is going to when we mail in that ballot, pull that lever, or push those buttons. Right now I am again trying to get a Democrat elected. Libertarians should have a voice, and I sympathize with their concerns. So why am I always pushing for ever larger government, ever larger control? 

That's a big question for me, and it's one I can't answer without getting muddled in historical and philosophical issues which transcend my ability to communicate about history and philosophy. I should add here that I have cast red votes for local politicians. I think I voted for a Republican Treasurer once. But it probably hurt a little, and I did it on the advice of my mom, who also tends to support Democrats more than she used to. 

I guess this brings me to the current Federal Government. We're contending with DrumpfMoscow Mitch and Nancy Antoinette. During a pandemic and an economic lockdown. Who can lead us? Joe is getting older and Rumple is divisive. 

The answer is I do not know

So we should come up with a term for the average voter. The average person whose ballot might not even be counted, might be lost in a sea of ballots, might not get counted because of a hanging chad. (See Bush v. Gore, 2000).

There you go. The average voter's name is Chad. Chafing Chad. He casts his vote into the void, asserting his conscience against chaos. He chafes against the powers that be. Let's all vote for Chad. Chad who hangs tough and casts his vote anyway.

Scenes from a Quarantine

I haven't written here in a while. There are too many problems to solve. I say that in jest, with an attitude that is partly self effacing, but with a feeling of shame accompanied by ambivalence as garishly hued as a box of crayons. Facebook holds me in its clutches, and I'm feeling a need to be productive in a way that doesn't involve arguing to the point of livid stalemate and hopeless impasse. The sun is shining outside. It's the middle of April. I feel honestly like I haven't much to say. The robins took wing weeks ago, but the orders to stay home and avoid contact override the springtime chirping of any birds. Instead, I hear the trilling clamor of the news warnings and the the ringing cautionary notes of my own fearful brain. 

Why do we grind against each other so? Why do we bother to face off on questions of politics? Does it even make any difference whether my opinion supersedes yours, in the larger scheme of things? Should be be dialoguing at all? 

The process of the vote in this country is what it is. I always like to say, "Everyone is entitled to their own vote." My mother likes to respond with, "Yes, but not everyone is entitled to their own facts."

Fact is hard to come by, especially when we're all surfing the red and blue surfboards of opinion as we ride the wave of a sudden, unexpected and totally uncontrollable pandemic. Things are scary out there, and they're getting scarier. 

How do we proceed from here? States and persons and authorities and journalists are clamoring for a reopening of the economy. Health advisors are cautioning us against a second wave of dire death, and the comparison to the Spanish Flu is again surfacing all over social media. The Spanish Flu? I'm a skeptic about that one, but the numbers do continue to rise. Right? We're seeing images of coffins and refrigerators, hearing stories of prisoners in New Jersey and New York burying the dead in large numbers. I don’t know about you, but such spectres make me cower. 

And then there's the Constitution. The right to worship. The right to assemble. The right to work and provide for one's own. The right not to be under the government's weighty thumb. While some of those concerns I just mentioned are not exactly enshrined in the Bill of Rights, it's right there in the Declaration of Independence. Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. I'm sure there are some who would rather be exposed to illness than twiddle their thumbs at this point. They want to paint. They want to do odd jobs. They want to earn an income. Some of them want to do anything besides listen to the constant stream of bad news radiating like a wave of particles from Chernobyl through the flat screen of what used to be appropriately nicknamed the boob tube

Then there's the issue of trust. Trust in one another. Is your neighbor exposed? Trust in authority. Is the media exposing you to propaganda? Trust for government. Is Trump a tyrant? Was Obama out of line? What about Bush? How far back does the government malfeasance and incompetence go? Who will Biden pick and will he make any strides when it comes to progress at the national level, however you define it? 

Why are we arguing? Why are we listening? Why are we even engaged? The most important question of all, "Is despair an option?"

My answer to that is NO. Despair is not an option. Keep talking to one another. Keep caring for your neighbor, no matter their political views. No matter what church they attend, whether they're Muslim or atheist, gay, transgender, gossipy or a peacock. Because that's the only way our country will survive. 

I was having a conversation last night with one of my best friends. He helped me set up my business, my blog, my sense of self, during a productive week two years ago when he visited me from his home in Canada. Last night we were talking over the phone about a quote I viewed online, which I will paraphrase: 

If you have a question about someone's motivation or character, look to the character of their friends. 

This very benevolent friend of mine said, "Write your next blog about that. And tie it in to the vote." 

I need to clarify that this conversation was a bit complicated by, and tied directly to, our understanding of politics and the current climate, and the political sympathies we were both privy to through online discussions. We were discussing how to vote if you don't care at all about politics (Conclusion: Don't vote), and the ethics of abstaining when you're actually invested in the political process (Conclusion: Everyone should be), and most importantly, how to vote when you can't decide who to vote for. These are deep questions for troubling times. Our election approaches, and pretty much every person I talk to, online and in person, is wringing their hands politically over one deep quandary or another. 

The conclusion of my friend? Vote for the candidate the people you most love, and who most love youvote for. Vote as an elector of family. Or let your family be your electoral college of the mind. Spin it any way you want, you and me both. Be your own Super PAC. Fund your decisions with warmth and compassion and the fires of home and the soul food of novelty and change. You get my drift. 

Citizens United. For real this time

The Women's March and A Season of Change

It's been two and a half years now since I attended the March in DC on behalf of women and all humans. Depending on who I am dialoguing with, learning from, reading, or listening to, my feelings about my attendance at that grand event have been of the up-and-down variety. I know nobody is perfect. We all see through a glass darkly. And the times, they are a' changin'. We're in a state of constant flux, both personally and politically.

At the time of the March, I wasn't motivated to attend. But thank God we have supporters around us, who for their own reasons, prod us towards a higher goal that we ourselves absorb in the light of our own thoughts and perceptions. My mother and sister badly wanted to protest. I, on the other hand, was ambivalent about Trump's election. I am ambivalent about all politicians–Politics is often referred to as "Hollywood for ugly people." And Hillary and Trump both seemed brash to me–opportunistic, competitive, baiting, and striving. I know that's how you have to be when you're aiming for the top position in the country, so I usually just keep my mouth shut. 'Don't complain' has always been my mantra in a personal sense. I guess it had carried over to my politics as well.

We were all of us different in the March. And I spoke to many who were in town for the inauguration, who were at least a little pleased to see Trump had been elected, and who I believe also wanted the best for their country. One sweet woman I met on the the night before the March saw me as a political convert, believed after our short conversation that I was in the wrong place. That I had been misled. That I didn't want to be there. We had a wonderful conversation and she prayed for me, which is something I don't object to. Maybe because we had a connection, and I empathized with her point of view, she could only experience me as a lost soul. She was certainly a nice lady. I know she seemed mystified as I walked away with my only family, as we continued on with our plans. But she didn't really know me, nor I her.

My father attended the March and I also went to the inauguration with him. It was the only chance he would ever have to see a President sworn into office. He was very emotional about it. During the inauguration itself, the huge lawn was packed with both kind souls and what I can only describe as putrid consciences. I experienced both a lack of judgment on the part of the presumably conservative women in my immediate vicinity (who knew I would be marching the next day), and ugly remarks and calls about Michelle Obama, Hillary, and Charles Schumer by others as they entered the stage. There was clapping and hooting, booing and hissing. It was raucous. I didn't hate being there. It was an experience. The whole trip to DC was an experience. I clapped for Trump, just as I clapped for Schumer and Michelle. I loved the color blue on Melania.

And what of the March itself? Not a raucous event at all, totally peaceful although there were times I was claustrophobic as the crowd flowed and moved like water waves with its own will. Like the will of the people, the March was a fluid thing. There were times I kept my mouth shut and objected to the chants. Shouting "SHAME!" while moving past the Trump Hotel was not something I wished to participate in. I did not know the man. I did not understand his motivations. All I had seen of his point of view was through the distant, detached, mechanical voice of Twitter. My sign read, "Trade Trump 2020", hashtag "beauty matters". We marched past the Bikers for Trump who vigilantly guarded the edges of the wave of people. They were peaceful. Behind me was a physically challenged girl who was maybe 10 or 11 years old. She marched on crutches. Her family consented to my dad taking a brief video of her, and he becomes emotional every time he shares with friends and family the photos and videos of our experience in DC. We all get tearful when we remember the event through the eyes of that girl.

Nobody is perfect. And no political essay can be perfect. And no action taken is perfect. That's how I viewed the whole event–both the inauguration and the March. Everybody was there for a different reason, and the time itself was exhilarating. I had zero bad experiences or encounters. We were all encountering a new President, and we were in the moment, which is the best way to be.

I haven't been paying attention to the all the recent developments in the Russia investigation. I try to get my hands on media that represents both sides of all world events, but I only become more confused by the day. I have to remind myself that's normal. That we see through a glass darkly. I have to tell you though, one of my biggest concerns is environmental. There were plenty of families there that day, so I could never describe the event as anti-family. My own family marched, and each member had a different perspective. My mom cared about healthcare.

What's my point? Well, it's that the will of the people is an absurd thing. A flowing, ever changing thing. Trump is looking guiltier by the day. Of obstruction of justice, if nothing else. I still think he should be traded in, but I can't exactly tell you why.